As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
Hanif Basree Abdul Rahman - Academic Staff. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs. As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue. As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
As you can see, the strength of the prosecution's case was founded on the two witness' testimony which was shown to be untrue.
As a matter of fact, even if the testimonies were accepted, they were still only circumstantial and the testimony of the two housemates actually contradicts theirs.
0 Komentar